SNGF: Oldest Record

SNGF: Oldest Record

I’m having some Saturday Night Genealogy Fun (#SNGF), with help from Randy Seaver and his prompts! Feel free to join in.

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: September 26, 2026

Prompt: “What is “Your Oldest Confirmed Record?”  What is one of the oldest documents you’ve personally found for any ancestor?”

A Lucky Find

Not long after I discovered I was a Thibou (shout-out to Dorothy Koenig and Bill Vinehout, both RIP), I did a random Google search for the surname. Hey, don’t knock it till you’ve tried it!

That search turned up PURE GOLD in the form of a manuscript.

My oldest confirmed record is a letter written by my seventh great-grandfather, Louis Thibou, in 1683.

Louis Thibou’s Letter

This discovery came long before I had heard of the now-defunct NUCMC catalog for manuscripts. The Teaching American History in South Carolina website had posted documents online, including “Letter from Louis Thibou to friends and family in France, 1683” (archived here).

Louis was a French Huguenot who had fled to London and then, in 1680, was sent aboard the Richmond to settle Carolina.

The beginning of his letter reads a little like a sales pitch for Carolina, but then Louis moves on to more personal matters—and that’s where it becomes especially fascinating to me as a genealogist.

You can read the entire English transcription at the link above, but here are some of the gems that absolutely enthralled me:

“I shall give you details about this country and its mode of life, and first of all I shall describe to you that it is a wooded country with lovely savannas or plains crossed by fine rivers very full of fish in which anyone who likes can fish and with enough oysters to feed a kingdom.”

And this wonderfully practical assessment:

“Carolina is a good country for anyone who is not lazy; however poor he may be, he can live well provided he is willing to take a little trouble.”

But then the letter becomes personal:

“[W]hen I arrive[d] with my wife and 3 children I was not worth a farthing and my furniture did not consist of very much, whereas now I am beginning to live well.”

And more personal still:

“My wife and all my family are well, thank God. My poor little Loton [?] died out here but God has given us a son who is called Jacob after the one we lost in England; the captain of a warship was his godfather.”

Then there is this:

“I beg to you let me have some news and to convey the enclosed to M. Marriette of Place Maubert, Paris.”

Marriette was his wife’s maiden name—a tantalizing genealogical clue tucked inside an ordinary request.

Louis also wrote:

“Once again I beg you to write to me and to give us news of our relatives, how they are getting on in France under the persecution.”

And finally, one of the lines that leaves me with more questions than answers:

“I beg you to tell the mother of the little boy I brought along that he is well and that I have received the letter she wrote.”

Who was that little boy? I would love to know.

So Many Clues

That is what strikes me whenever I return to this letter. There are so many clues packed into it: children born and lost, relatives in France, his wife’s family, migration, religion, economic circumstances, social connections—and even an unidentified child who traveled with Louis.

Each time I read the letter, I notice something else.

I might have to run the letter through AI and see what additional clues I’ve overlooked. That sounds like a future project!

My Takeaway

Tom Jones teaches us about “the perils of source snobbery”—the danger of sticking only to well-regarded sources and not even checking supposedly unreliable ones, such as mug books, online family trees, and the like.

I am as guilty of source snobbery as anyone.

But I am very glad that, all those years ago, I simply typed a surname into Google and went looking.

That lucky internet search eventually taught me something I have tried to remember ever since: take in all the information first. Then evaluate it.

You never know where the clue that leads to PURE GOLD might be hiding.

My Personal Touch

And there is one more chapter to this story.

I am delighted to say that I eventually made a trip to the Columbiana Public Library and held Louis’ original 1683 letter in my own hands!

After first discovering his words as the result of a random internet search, actually holding the document he had written more than three centuries earlier was something very special.

More on that journey here.

Me holding the 343 year old letter written by my seventh great grandfather, Louis Thibou

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.

https://theancestorwhisperer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/image-1.jpeg

What I Learned by Attending NYSFHC in Person

On September 18 and 19, I attended the 2026 New York State Family History Conference in person at the New York Genealogical and Biographical Society headquarters in Manhattan.

I had already registered for the conference’s many on-demand sessions, so I certainly could have stayed home and watched the live program there too, as I have for many years. But I am very glad I did not.

As it turns out, attending a genealogy conference in person is about much more than watching presentations.

I Paid Attention

Let’s begin with an uncomfortable truth: when I watch a webinar at home, I multitask.

I check my email. I look something up. I start following a promising research trail. Before I know it, the speaker is discussing something important and I have no idea how we got there.

Sitting in the room at NYG&B, I paid attention. I listened closely, took notes, and remained engaged. That alone made attending in person worthwhile.

The conference followed a single stream, so I did not have to choose between competing sessions. That made life much easier. I could settle in and follow the program without worrying that I was missing something even better in the next room.

Do Not Judge a Session by Its Title

The presentation that surprised me most was D. Joshua Taylor’s Beyond the Empire State: Records of New Yorkers Found Elsewhere.

I had looked at the title and thought that the subject probably would not be particularly relevant to my research.

I was wrong.

The presentation helped me understand how records created outside New York might contain valuable information about people who once lived there. It gave me a different way to think about where my ancestors and relatives might have left records and where I should look next.

That was a good reminder not to decide too quickly that a presentation has nothing to offer me. Sometimes the session I least expect to need is the one that changes how I approach my research.

The People Matter

One of the greatest benefits of attending in person was simply being with other genealogists.

I met several people whom I enjoyed speaking with. We had lovely conversations, and then we went our separate ways.

Next time, I want to be better prepared for that. I would like to bring a few simple business cards with my name, email, and blog address. If I make a connection, I want to have an easy way to continue it.

I also spoke with an NYG&B employee who showed me the organization’s digitization station. That conversation may lead to our working together on a future digitization project (if I hear back from her, lol). I certainly would not have had that opportunity while watching from my desk at home.

Oh, Those Books!

Having the conference at NYG&B headquarters was wonderful.

The gathering was relatively small, and I would have enjoyed meeting a few more people. Still, there was something special about being in the organization’s own space, surrounded by its collections.

During the conference, several of us admired the books together. We all recognized that we were looking at potential genealogical gold mines.

I am now compiling a list of books and resources I would like to examine and have inquired about returning for a research visit. I just have to free up some time. That should be easy, right?

I could have stepped out during a less relevant session to spend more time looking at the books. I did not think to do that at the time. Next time, I will give myself permission to be flexible. If something unexpected attracts my attention, I do not have to remain glued to my chair simply because a presentation is underway.

Lunch Is Part of the Conference

Leaving the building for lunch also meant leaving the conversations.

In the future, I would bring lunch or arrange to have it delivered. Staying at the venue during the lunch hour would give me more time to speak with other attendees, compare research interests, and perhaps discover another useful connection.

Those informal conversations are not interruptions to the conference experience. They are part of it.

Prepare for the People, Not Just the Program

Before my next in-person conference, I want to identify which speakers will actually be there. I met Jane Wilcox for the first time, and could say nothing other than my name.

For each speaker, I could note something interesting, thoughtful, or relevant that I might ask about if an opportunity arises. I do not need to prepare an interrogation! One genuine question or point of connection would be enough to make starting a conversation easier.

I also discovered that if I make the effort to attend in person, I want the speakers to be there in person too. Recorded or remotely delivered presentations can be excellent, but I already have plenty of those among the conference’s on-demand offerings. Part of the value of traveling to a conference is the chance to experience the speakers and their ideas in the room.

The organizers did an excellent job of keeping the program on schedule. I simply would have preferred the in-person portion to feature in-person speakers throughout.

Next Time, Add a Research Day

My ideal plan for a future NYSFHC would be to arrive a day early and devote that day to research at NYG&B.

Yes, that would mean paying for an additional hotel night in Manhattan. It would not be inexpensive. However, it would allow me to explore the collection without trying to squeeze research into conference breaks. It would also ensure that I began the conference rested rather than arriving after early morning traveling.

Looked at that way, the extra day might be a net positive rather than merely an added expense.

My Notes for Next Time

Before my next in-person genealogy conference, I want to remember to:

  • Bring lunch or arrange for delivery.
  • Bring business cards with my email and blog.
  • Identify the speakers who will attend in person.
  • Prepare one possible question or conversation topic for each speaker.
  • Exchange contact information with people I enjoy meeting.
  • Leave room in the schedule for unexpected discoveries.
  • Step out of a truly irrelevant session if something more valuable awaits.
  • Avoid deciding that a session is irrelevant based only on its title.
  • Consider adding a separate research day before the conference.
  • Follow up promptly on promising conversations and possible projects.

The presentations gave me new information, but attending in person gave me something more. It gave me conversations, possibilities, shelves full of future discoveries, and the pleasure of standing among other genealogists who also recognized a room full of books as a room full of treasure.

That is an experience that no on-demand recording can quite reproduce.

Have you attended a genealogy conference in person? What do you do to make the most of the people, resources, and unexpected opportunities around you?

AI disclosure: I used artificial intelligence to help organize and polish my reflections for this post. The experiences, opinions, and lessons are my own.

52 Ancestors: What Wasn’t Written Down

52 Ancestors: What Wasn’t Written Down

I’ve adapted Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks challenge.
Each week I follow my children’s ahnentafel numbering to select the featured ancestor, ensuring no one through the mid–sixth generation is left behind.

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: 2026 Week 39: What Wasn’t Written Down

Our Ancestor

My Week 39 ancestor is Rosie. And in her case, I don’t have to look far for what wasn’t written down: her surname.

What I Know, and How I Know It

Jennie (Sheindel) Felder, whom you may recall from earlier posts, immigrated from “Austria” and married a year or two later. I have found no trace of her mother, and all I know about Rosie comes from records created during and after Jennie’s lifetime:

  • Jennie’s marriage record (she was 23 in 1888) says that she was born in Austria to “Rosie”
  • Jennie’s death record, at age 63, lists her mother as “don’t know” born in “Austria”

Somewhere between those two records, even Rosie’s given name disappeared from family knowledge—or at least from the knowledge of the person who reported Jennie’s death.

The Search for Rosie

What wasn’t written down, as far as Rosie is concerned, is a whole lifetime. I don’t know her surname, where in “Austria” she lived, whom she married, or what became of her. Someday I may crack this nut—or perhaps a descendant will.

Jennie’s tombstone doesn’t give a hint of her mother.

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.

Next Week’s Topic: A Moment of Courage

SNGF: Unfinished Projects

I’m having some Saturday Night Genealogy Fun (#SNGF), with help from Randy Seaver and his prompts! Feel free to join in.

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: September 19, 2026

Prompt: “What started but unfinished projects do you have?  Define one or more of them, and how far along you are in the project.”

Raise Your Hand

Who among us doesn’t have at least a handful of unfinished genealogy projects? Bueller? Bueller?[1]

Some Projects

When planning for 2026, I categorized my genealogy projects to make them more manageable. It’s helping, so I’ll offer some of my projects in these categories:

  • Learning: I attended not one but two IGHR classes this year (Genetics for Genealogists: Fundamentals of DNA and Writing Genealogical Proofs Using Documentary and Genetic Evidence) as well as NYSFHC 2026, RootsTech 2026, and using my FamilyTreeWebinars subscription so much that ChatGPT says “You’ve basically built yourself a graduate-level genealogy + AI curriculum”!
  • Research: I do research as needed for my book (see below) and make a parking lot of Research Questions which come up, which I then hit as time allows (hah!). One of my more interesting RQs here is Patrick Dobbins, who migrated from Famine-era Ireland, across much of the United States, and then to Brazil, where he settled.
  • Writing: the primary outlet of this is my blog. I had a dream of publishing a genealogical article, which I achieved (in a local gen club’s newsletter), but haven’t yet set or started the next. Writing the blog, which I am doing weekly for both Saturday Night Genealogy Fun and 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks, is satisfying enough for this year.
  • Leadership: this was a stretch goal for me. I agreed to lead an AI SIG for a genealogy group, which I’ve discussed before so won’t again. It was and is not easy for this introvert but it’s really rewarding!
  • Ancestors Book (Generation 7): Several years ago, I started a book about the ancestors of my children. I had my software create the first draft, then did a lot of cleanup. Now each year I organize and do further research on another generation; this year is Gen 7. I publish a new copy at a local print shop and give it to either of my children (this is also a form of backup for me). It’s not cheap, but the rewards are incomparable.

Of course, now that I look at this, I realize that I put them into different categories in my Todoist app:

  • Ancestors Book (Generation 7): detailed above
  • Blog posts: also above
  • Connection and community: this is attending conferences in person, and helping people one on one
  • Personal research questions: due to a busy schedule, I’m forced to parking lot most of my rabbit holes. Eventually I’ll get back to them, I swear!
  • Payback: volunteer work and helping others: I administer Richmond County NYGenWeb, index for the WNYGS, lead a Special Interest Group (SIG) for NWSGS, and help people individually occasionally – including one Netherlander who has adopted an American solider killed abroad in WWII – wish I could have more luck for him.
  • Education: see above
  • Research trips: this is another example where my eyes were bigger than my stomach. I planned so much that I haven’t done. I want to visit the Alexander Library and Trenton in New Jersey, Ohio, NYC, and Buffalo NY for research trips. Salt Lake City someday. I haven’t truly done any of them this year; haven’t even done my local FamilySearch Center but once this year.

I will definitely need to reconcile the two, but these things are some of what I’m working on this year!

Wrap-Up

Yes, I’m type A, why do you ask?

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.


[1] Pop culture reference, referring to there being no one answering the question. John Hughes et al.. Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2006.

SNGF: Serendipity

I’m having some Saturday Night Genealogy Fun (#SNGF), with help from Randy Seaver and his prompts! Feel free to join in.

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: September 12, 2026

Prompt: “Serendipity! What happened when you went looking for an ancestor or a genealogical record and were pleasantly surprised to find someone else or something else you didn’t expect while you were doing that search?”

Surprise!

You know how so many webinar presenters tell you about records to look for? Once you’ve searched the vital and church records, then done land and probate, there are many other genealogical gems to be had.

I found one of them quite by accident.

I have ancestors buried at St. Andrew’s in Staten Island, New York, and had requested a microfilm (yes, I’m that old) which had a book about its vital records and gravestone inscriptions.

You know how the webinar presenters also tell you to keep scrolling? The immigration record might have a page 2 or the census might have additional schedules. I kept scrolling in this microfilm to the other items on it and found a school census!

Catalog entry: https://www.familysearch.org/en/search/catalog/results?count=100&q.filmNumber=514659

For this particular school district, the list contains: name, residence, age. It’s a goldmine if you’re lucky, especially in that awkward 1880-1900 time frame! So keep scrolling, you never know what you’ll find.

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.

52 Ancestors: A Document With Personality

I’ve adapted Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks challenge.
Each week I follow my children’s ahnentafel numbering to select the featured ancestor, ensuring no one through the mid–sixth generation is left behind.

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: 2026 Week 38: A Document With Personality

James Felder, Almost

My Week 38 ancestor is James Felder.

This week’s theme is “A Document with Personality,” but I have a problem: I don’t actually have a document belonging to James Felder.

What I have are documents belonging to his daughter, Jennie.

Jennie’s marriage record identifies her father as James, with the family surname recorded as “Feltler.” Her death certificate gives her father’s name as James Felder.

And then there is her tombstone.

It identifies her as the “daughter of Mr. Avraham Yosef.”

Is Avraham Yosef the Hebrew name of the man who appears as James Felder in the civil records? It seems possible, but at this point I don’t have enough evidence to say so with confidence.

And that is about as far as I can responsibly take James’s story.

I don’t yet have a census record, vital record, probate file, immigration record, or other document that I can confidently attach to James himself. For now, I can see him only indirectly, through the records left by his daughter.

But even those few references have given me something important: two names to investigate instead of one.

So James—or perhaps Avraham Yosef—goes back onto my research list.

Sometimes an ancestor’s week arrives before his records do.

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.

Next Week’s Topic: What Wasn’t Written Down

52 Ancestors: A Small Detail I Love

I’ve adapted Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks challenge.
Each week I follow my children’s ahnentafel numbering to select the featured ancestor, ensuring no one through the mid–sixth generation is left behind.

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: 2026 Week 37: A Small Detail I Love

Who to Chase?

My Week 37 ancestor is Fanny Segal. Fanny is someone whose name is the detail I’m trying to pin down.

Precious Little Info

I have no direct records of Fanny. Her name comes from records her son, Joseph Frank, left behind.

RecordDateMother’s nameMother’s birth place
Joseph’s marriage1888FannyNot asked
Joseph’s death1916Sophie [?] Segal*Russia

* Upon further reflection, I rather doubt my reading of “Sophie.” The copy I have is extremely blurry but I no longer think it says Sophie. New York City is digitizing its vital records, but has not yet gotten around to Manhattan 1916. The first letter is in line with other capital “S” in the record.

An Important Detail

It might be worth a trip into New York City to try to get a better copy of Joseph’s death certificate. I’ve found no potential siblings for Joseph to try to chase his parents that way. So on reflection, I’ve realized that I don’t really know one very important detail about Fanny Segal—her name. Every question answered, every recheck, seems to lead to more research – and more possibilities!

Why, oh why can’t they digitize Manhattan fully?

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.

Next Week’s Topic: A Document With Personality

52 Ancestors: More Than a Name

52 Ancestors: More Than a Name

I’ve adapted Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks challenge.
Each week I follow my children’s ahnentafel numbering to select the featured ancestor, ensuring no one through the mid–sixth generation is left behind.

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: 2026 Week 36: More Than a Name

Who was Samuel Frank?

My Week 36 ancestor is Samuel Frank. His son Joseph Frank, who was Jewish, immigrated from Russia in 1872. Joseph’s marriage names his father as “Samuel” and his death record names his father as Samuel born Russia.  

Identifying Samuel Frank

Research questions may be around relationship, identity, or event. To work on Samuel’s identity, we must understand the records we have for him – which are precious few. Without knowing where in Russia Joseph came from, or Joseph’s original name, it will be difficult to identify his father Samuel.

A Bonus Clue

Luckily for me, Jewish headstones often name the father – so I get confirmation AND a little more information.

Joseph is buried in Washington Cemetery, in Brooklyn, Kings County, New York.

On Facebook, Simon Philip Jackson translated the Hebrew inscription on his tombstone, which identifies him as ‘Mr. Yosef son of Mr. Shmuel David’. So I have indeed confirmed Samuel and added an additional given name.

The inscription connects Joseph to his father and to his family’s religious naming tradition. And Samuel is no longer simply a name recorded on his son’s marriage and death records. Even though I still know very little about him, seeing Shmuel David preserved on his son’s gravestone makes him a little more real to me.

What This Clue Gives Me

Sometimes all we have are straws to grasp at. But this one is tantalizing. Samuel now has another name: Shmuel David. It isn’t enough to identify him, but it is enough to make him a little less anonymous—and enough to keep me searching.

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.

Next Week’s Topic: A Small Detail I Love

52 Ancestors: A Spot on the Map

52 Ancestors: A Spot on the Map

I’ve adapted Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks challenge.
Each week I follow my children’s ahnentafel numbering to select the featured ancestor, ensuring no one through the mid–sixth generation is left behind.

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks: 2026 Week 35: A Spot on the Map

Where was Fanny’s mother?

My Week 35 ancestor is the unknown mother of Fanny Steinberg. I have an ancestor whose identity is unknown and whose location is almost equally elusive.

Following Fanny Through Sam’s Records

To have any hope of finding Fanny’s mother, though, I first have to find Fanny. The records of Sam Birnbaum (born circa 1884) identify his mother as:

RecordDateMotherMother’s birth
Marriage1906Fannie Steinberg(not asked)
SS-51936Fanny Stamberger(not asked)
Death1954Fannie SteinhartCzec.

I’ve not yet been able to locate Fanny anywhere.

A Very Large Spot on the Map

Before World War II, Czechoslovakia included territory that is now part of Ukraine, but by 1954 that territory had been ceded to the Soviet Union.

Around the time Fanny was likely born, about 1850, the lands that later became Czechoslovakia were divided among several parts of the Austrian Empire, including Bohemia, Moravia, Austrian Silesia, and the Kingdom of Hungary.

So you might see why I am at a loss as to where to chase the unknown mother of Fanny!

The Map That Doesn’t Quite Help

A modern map helps to make the problem visible. ‘Czec.’ sounds like a location, but it still leaves an enormous area—and modern borders are not the borders Fanny or her mother would have known.

What I Know—and What I Still Need
I have a location, but I don’t have enough specifics. Much like my Irish folks are difficult to trace without at least a county, the changing European borders put me in what is now multiple countries.

Summary
Sometimes “a spot on the map” begins as a very large blot—and the research task is gradually to make that spot smaller.

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.

Next Week’s Topic: More than a Name, where I resume named ancestors

SNGF: How Do You Use Artificial Intelligence Tools?

SNGF: How Do You Use Artificial Intelligence Tools?

I’m having some Saturday Night Genealogy Fun (#SNGF), with help from Randy Seaver and his prompts! Feel free to join in.

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: September 5, 2026

Prompt: “How do you use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to help you understand the lives, history, and geography associated with your family and your ancestors, that aid your genealogy and family history research?”

My Background

I am in technology, and happily jumped onto the Artificial Intelligence (AI) bandwagon years ago. I then added my genealogy work into the mix with the help of Steve Little and NGS’s Empowering Genealogists with Artificial Intelligence in the fall of 2023. How do I use AI in genealogy?

Let me count the ways…

I lead an AI Special Interest Group (SIG) so it’s a question I’m thrilled to be asked. My emphasis is generally on low-lift, high-impact applications.

I have also written about AI in my blog, and evolved it into adapting 52 Ancestors into my own flavor: 52 AI Ancestors.

My Own Top List

Primarily, I use AI for getting  research ideas: I give it what I have and ask what to try next. It’s great when my brain is just stuck. I use it for organizing research (here are a bunch of notes I took, can you compile a timeline). Finally, I get help writing narratives (be sure to set up guardrails about sourced facts) – usually I write my draft and have AI critique it, including for this blog.

Many Other Ways We Explore AI

I asked Claude (of course I did) to create a list based on my meeting topics, past and future. I feel it’s important to delineate that we should do the research because that’s what we are good at. We should keep AI “in its lane” – that said, here are some great applications.

How AI Shows Up in Genealogy Research

  • Finding & Reading Records
    • Transcribing difficult or old handwriting (Transkribus)
    • Translating foreign-language records
    • Reading and interpreting records more broadly
    • Using AI-powered search and hints within FamilySearch Labs
  • Research Planning & Problem-Solving
    • Building a research plan from a research question (GPS-grounded)
    • Working brick walls — turning a stuck case into a next step
    • Analyzing and sorting conflicting evidence, including similarly-named people
    • Prompt design — using Context/Task/Format/Constraints to get better answers
  • Organizing & Managing Research
    • Organizing findings and querying your own research collection
    • Reusable prompt templates and project folders (a repeatable workflow)
    • Photo organization, colorization, and restoration (MyHeritage AI)
  • DNA
    • Making sense of match lists and clustering
  • Writing & Sharing
    • Writing up research findings and family narratives
    • Creating life-sketch content, including AI-generated imagery, done responsibly
    • Citing sources and research summaries
  • Evaluation & Judgment (the thread running through everything)
    • Verifying AI answers against primary sources before trusting them
    • Comparing tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot) for different tasks
    • Privacy practices — what’s safe to share about living relatives, DNA data, etc.
    • Treating AI output as a hypothesis to check, not a fact to file away

What Matters Most

You’re the genealogist, and AI is a people-pleaser. Here’s what I think matters most: verification and judgment.

Try It

The beauty of it is, it’s super easy to get started in AI, and perfection is not expected. Just get started! Try getting AI to help with one genealogy task you already do, and see what you think of the results.

Created with ChatGPT

AI Disclosure

This post was created by me with the help of AI tools. While AI helps organize research, the storytelling and discoveries are my own.